Divorce Valuations

Divorce & Financial Remedy Proceedings

Independent vehicle valuations for divorce and separation

Independent expert inspection and valuation of specialist vehicles and marital assets removes uncertainty, reduces conflict and supports fair outcomes. I am regularly instructed by solicitors and directly by parties to provide clear, defensible vehicle valuations for use in divorce proceedings.

I provide independent non-AI divorce vehicle valuations for use in financial remedy proceedings, whether matters are resolved by agreement or go to court.

In divorce and financial remedy proceedings, agreeing the value of vehicles is often a source of dispute. Many owners distort or undervalue their cars or use WeBuyAnyCar, which is not representative. Classic cars and specialist vehicles sit outside traditional valuation guides.

My valuation reports are prepared for the Family Court or the Mediation Process and are trusted by judges, solicitors and barristers. The investment always pays for itself in much fairer outcomes.

Read more about John Glynn – Car Valuer.

Single Joint Expert (SJE) Valuations

Independent valuations prepared where both parties jointly instruct one expert. SJE reports comply with Family Procedure Rules Part 25 and are designed to minimise dispute and control costs. See more below.

Single Party Valuations

Valuations prepared for one party where joint instruction is not possible or appropriate. Reports provide an independent assessment suitable for negotiation or court consideration.

High Net Worth Divorce Valuations

Valuations of classic cars, collections, supercars and specialist vehicles within higher-value or complex divorce cases, including assets with limited comparables or specialist provenance.

Historic Date Valuations

Valuations prepared at specific historic dates where assets were acquired, transferred, sold or concealed prior to separation.

Hidden, Disputed or Incomplete Assets

Desktop valuations prepared where information is limited, assets are disputed, or vehicle condition or existence is unclear. Research-based assessments supported by market evidence.

Motorcycles, Collections and Specialist Vehicles

Valuation of motorcycles, racing cars, modified vehicles and collections that fall outside mainstream valuation guides.

Our process

A calm, independent valuation process

Divorce valuations require sensitivity, clarity and independence. My process is designed to reduce friction, avoid advocacy and provide valuations that courts and advisers can rely upon.

Instruction & Context

I take a clear brief from solicitors or parties, including the procedural context, valuation date and intended use of the report. This ensures the valuation is framed correctly from the outset.

Evidence & Research

Valuations are supported by market evidence, model-specific knowledge and condition assessment. Where information is limited, assumptions are stated clearly and proportionately.

Independent Assessment

I do not work to target figures. Valuations are prepared independently and reflect market reality at the relevant date, not negotiating positions.

Clear, Court-Ready Reporting

Reports are written in clear language and structured for solicitor, counsel and judicial review, helping reduce dispute and unnecessary delay.

Single Joint Expert Valuations in Divorce Proceedings

Disputes concerning the value of classic cars, motorcycles and other specialist vehicles can hold up financial remedy proceedings. Appointing a Single Joint Expert (SJE) offers a practical and equitable solution, allowing both parties to rely on one independent valuation rather than commissioning separate reports and debating conflicting conclusions.

The principal benefit of the SJE procedure is that both parties work from the same evidence. The expert is appointed jointly, acts independently and provides a reasoned opinion intended to assist the court and facilitate negotiations.

The procedure has its origins in the civil justice reforms of the late 1990s, with provision for Single Joint Experts introduced under the Civil Procedure Rules in 1999. The Family Procedure Rules 2010 subsequently established the framework for family proceedings, with significant revisions to Part 25 taking effect in 2013. Expert evidence in financial remedy proceedings is governed by Part 25 and Practice Direction 25D.

The process is relatively simple. The parties, normally through their solicitors, agree upon a suitably qualified expert and issue a joint letter of instruction identifying the vehicles and the matters requiring assessment. If agreement cannot be reached, the court may determine who should be appointed. Expert fees are ordinarily divided equally between the parties, although alternative arrangements may be agreed or ordered by the court.

Following instruction, I inspect the relevant vehicles, examine the supporting documentation and undertake the necessary market research. My reports explain both the valuation conclusions and the evidence and reasoning supporting them. I do not simply provide a schedule of figures without meaningful explanation. Both parties receive the same report, and neither can influence its findings. My overriding professional duty remains to the court.

After the report is received, the parties normally have ten days in which to submit written questions seeking clarification, unless the court directs otherwise. In my experience, further questions are uncommon, although the procedure allows either party to request clarification where necessary. My written responses form part of the expert evidence.

The strength of the Single Joint Expert procedure lies in its transparency, independence and efficiency. By replacing competing valuations with one properly researched and explained assessment, it can reduce unnecessary correspondence, legal costs and disagreement. Both parties have a common evidential basis for negotiations, allowing financial remedy proceedings to move forward without vehicle valuation becoming an avoidable obstacle to settlement.

Divorce & financial remedy vehicle valuation services